Faculty of Humanities Academic Staff Annual Reports
Review of the teaching and methodological, scientific research,
and educational and cultural activities of academic staff.
Dean's DirectiveWorking Group EvaluationEstablished Criteria
Teaching and Methodological Activities
Education
Scientific Articles and Monographs
Research
International Cooperation and Projects
Cooperation
Educational, Cultural and Community Activities
Enlightenment
Areas of Evaluation
📚
Teaching and Methodological Activities
Quality of education, teaching effectiveness, and implementation of innovative methods.
🔬
Scientific Research
Publication of research articles and monographs, and participation in scientific projects.
🌐
International Cooperation
Partnerships with foreign universities and participation in international programmes.
🎓
Educational and Cultural Activities
Student development, community engagement, and educational initiatives.
Annual Reporting Procedure
The Dean issues the relevant directive and establishes a working group.
Organisational Stage
The performance of each academic staff member is reviewed according to established criteria.
Analysis Stage
Scientific publications, monographs, international cooperation, and participation in research projects are comprehensively assessed.
Research Performance Evaluation
Educational, cultural, and community activities conducted with students are taken into account.
Educational Activities Evaluation
Achievements and areas for improvement are identified, and priorities are established for the next academic year.
Final Stage
Significance of the Annual Report
The results of the annual reporting process play an important role in evaluating the effectiveness of academic staff, identifying achievements and areas for improvement, and determining strategic priorities for the upcoming academic year. This process serves as an essential mechanism for the continuous enhancement of educational quality.
